Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Family Court has jurisdiction under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 to adjudicate a dispute relating to property claimed by one spouse against the other after divorce.
Analysis: The expression used in the Family Courts Act for matters concerning marriage and family affairs was construed broadly in light of the object of the legislation, which is to secure conciliatory and speedy settlement of family disputes. Explanation (c) to Section 7 was read as extending to disputes concerning the property of the spouses or either of them, and not as being confined only to disputes between parties to a subsisting marriage. A narrow interpretation was held to defeat the legislative purpose. Earlier decisions dealing with claims under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 and proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were treated as inapplicable to the present dispute.
Conclusion: The Family Court had jurisdiction to decide the property dispute between the divorced parties, and the objection to maintainability failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 must receive a liberal construction so as to include disputes concerning the property of spouses or either of them, even where the marriage has ended in divorce.