Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods returned after failing testing for defence production were liable to immediate duty demand and penalty, and the manner in which the stock was to be accounted for.
Analysis: The goods were found to have been sent for testing for defence production and returned after failing such testing. In these facts, the matter was viewed with leniency. The material was directed to be inspected by the jurisdictional Superintendent and the quantity was to be entered in the RG-I stock. Duty was to be paid when the stock was cleared from the factory in future.
Conclusion: The immediate duty demand and penalty were not sustained in the manner sought by the Department, and the assessee was granted relief subject to compliance with stock accounting and duty payment on future clearance.