<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 98 - CESTAT,KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1734</link>
    <description>Goods sent for testing for defence production and returned after failing the test were not treated as immediately liable to duty demand and penalty in the manner sought by the Department. The material was directed to be inspected by the jurisdictional Superintendent and entered in RG-I stock, with duty to be paid when the stock is cleared from the factory in future. Relief was therefore granted subject to proper stock accounting and payment on subsequent clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 98 - CESTAT,KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1734</link>
      <description>Goods sent for testing for defence production and returned after failing the test were not treated as immediately liable to duty demand and penalty in the manner sought by the Department. The material was directed to be inspected by the jurisdictional Superintendent and entered in RG-I stock, with duty to be paid when the stock is cleared from the factory in future. Relief was therefore granted subject to proper stock accounting and payment on subsequent clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>