Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification application filed under section 25(A) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 was deemed to have been accepted due to the respondent's failure to decide it within the prescribed time, and whether the demand notice could be quashed as a consequence.
Analysis: The rectification application had been filed under section 25(A) and the statutory proviso entitled the petitioner to the benefit of deemed acceptance where no decision was taken within time. On the record, the respondent had not acted on the application within the prescribed period. Without entering into the merits of the assessment dispute, the Court held that the statutory consequence of inaction had followed. The demand notice issued thereafter for the assessment year 2004-05 was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The rectification application was treated as accepted by operation of law, and the impugned recovery notice was set aside in favour of the assessee.