Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commission received on distribution of mutual funds was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-S.T. as commission received by a commission agent in relation to sale or purchase of goods.
Analysis: The exemption applied to business auxiliary services provided by a commission agent in relation to sale or purchase of goods. The assessee specifically contended that mutual funds fell within the expression "goods" and relied on the statutory definition of goods as well as the SEBI understanding of mutual fund units. The authorities below did not record any finding on this specific plea and instead proceeded on the assumption that the exemption was unavailable. In these circumstances, the controversy required a fresh factual and legal determination on whether mutual funds could be treated as goods for the purpose of the notification.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Dy. Commissioner of Service Tax for fresh decision on the assessee's specific plea after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing.