<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 94 -  CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1718</link>
    <description>The exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-S.T. was examined in relation to commission earned from mutual fund distribution, turning on whether mutual fund units could be treated as &quot;goods&quot; for commission-agent exemption under business auxiliary services. The assessee relied on the statutory meaning of goods and SEBI&#039;s understanding of mutual fund units, but the authorities had not recorded a finding on this specific plea and had proceeded on the assumption that the exemption was unavailable. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Dy. Commissioner of Service Tax for fresh factual and legal determination after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 94 -  CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1718</link>
      <description>The exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-S.T. was examined in relation to commission earned from mutual fund distribution, turning on whether mutual fund units could be treated as &quot;goods&quot; for commission-agent exemption under business auxiliary services. The assessee relied on the statutory meaning of goods and SEBI&#039;s understanding of mutual fund units, but the authorities had not recorded a finding on this specific plea and had proceeded on the assumption that the exemption was unavailable. The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Dy. Commissioner of Service Tax for fresh factual and legal determination after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>