Revenue not required to file cross objections; delay excused; stay petition granted. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the Revenue was not required to file cross objections as the impugned order favored the appellants. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue not required to file cross objections; delay excused; stay petition granted.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the Revenue was not required to file cross objections as the impugned order favored the appellants. The delay in filing cross objections was excused, and the stay petition was granted.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that there was no need for the Revenue to file cross objections as the impugned order was against the appellants. The delay in filing cross objections was condoned, and the stay petition was allowed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.