<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 171 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171648</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the Revenue was not required to file cross objections as the impugned order favored the appellants. The delay in filing cross objections was excused, and the stay petition was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 171 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171648</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the Revenue was not required to file cross objections as the impugned order favored the appellants. The delay in filing cross objections was excused, and the stay petition was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>