Court dismisses appeal citing res judicata principle, emphasizing finality of orders. Appellant granted liberty to proceed.

The Court dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the principle of res judicata. The previous dismissal of the appeal by the Division Bench for lack of substantial question of law was held to bar the current appeal. The Court highlighted the importance of adhering to prior decisions and finality of orders, leading to the dismissal of the current appeal without indulgence. The appellant was granted liberty to proceed in accordance with the law, underscoring the significance of judicial decisions and procedural implications of withdrawing and refiling appeals.

---

---

Issues: Appeal under Section 35G of Central Excise Act challenging an order by the Tribunal, maintainability of the appeal, withdrawal of appeal with liberty to file a writ petition, subsequent filing of a writ petition, res judicata effect of previous orders on the current appeal.

Analysis:
The judgment involves an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act challenging an order of the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The maintainability of this appeal was questioned, highlighting that appeals under Section 35G are limited to substantial questions of law arising from the Tribunal's order. The Division Bench previously dismissed an appeal on the basis that no substantial question of law was involved, advising the petitioner to file a writ petition instead. Subsequently, a writ petition was filed and withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal under Section 35G, leading to the current appeal.

The Court emphasized the principle of res judicata, stating that the previous order from the Division Bench dismissing the appeal on the grounds of no substantial question of law operates as res judicata. The Court noted that as long as the order from 23-8-2006 remains valid and unchanged, the current appeal cannot be entertained based on the claim of substantial question of law. The judgment highlights the importance of adhering to previous decisions and the finality of orders, barring any indulgence in the current appeal due to the principles of res judicata.

Ultimately, the Court found no grounds for indulgence in the current appeal and dismissed it, granting the appellant liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. The judgment underscores the significance of prior judicial decisions, the limitations on appeal grounds under Section 35G, and the procedural implications of withdrawing and refiling appeals in the legal context. The application of res judicata in this case serves as a crucial aspect in determining the fate of the current appeal and upholding the integrity of the legal process.

---