Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty in respect of credit taken against refund claims under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., and whether a prima facie case existed for complete waiver.
Analysis: The notification allowed a manufacturer, on clearing specified motor vehicles and later obtaining proof that they were registered solely as taxi, to take credit of the excess duty paid and then seek refund, subject to the prescribed conditions. The Tribunal noted that the refund claims had already been rejected by the lower authorities and, on that footing, the appellants were not entitled to retain the credit availed. The earlier decision relied upon by the appellants was held inapplicable because it concerned a different notification without the present condition governing refund and reversal of credit. In the absence of financial hardship and considering the legal position under the notification, complete waiver was not warranted.
Conclusion: The appellants were directed to deposit 50% of the duty within eight weeks, and waiver of the remaining duty, interest and penalty was granted subject to such deposit.