Capital receipts from sale of estate trees and assessment-year law governed surcharge liability under agricultural income-tax rules.

Proceeds from the sale of gravelia firewood were treated as capital receipts because the trees were maintained as part of the estate's capital assets for shade, so their sale reflected realization of capital rather than business revenue and was not taxable as revenue receipt. Surcharge on agricultural income-tax for the 1957-58 assessment year was held valid because the surcharge law came into force before the close of that assessment year, and the law in force during the assessment year ordinarily governs unless a contrary intention appears.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amount realised by the sale of gravelia firewood was a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Agricultural Income-tax Act; (ii) Whether surcharge could be levied on the agricultural income-tax payable for the assessment year 1957-58.

Issue (i): Whether the amount realised by the sale of gravelia firewood was a revenue receipt liable to tax under the Agricultural Income-tax Act.

Analysis: The gravelia trees were maintained only to provide shade for the tea bushes and were treated as part of the capital assets of the estate. When such trees became old and useless and were cut and sold, the proceeds represented realization of a capital asset rather than a receipt arising in the ordinary course of business operations.

Conclusion: The amount realised by the sale of gravelia firewood was not a revenue receipt and was not taxable as such; the answer was in the negative and against the department.

Issue (ii): Whether surcharge could be levied on the agricultural income-tax payable for the assessment year 1957-58.

Analysis: The surcharge statute came into force after the expiry of the accounting period but before the close of the assessment year. In income-tax matters, the governing law is ordinarily the law in force during the assessment year unless a contrary intention appears. No contrary indication was found.

Conclusion: Surcharge could be levied for the assessment year 1957-58; the answer was in the affirmative and against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the sale proceeds of gravelia firewood were not taxable as revenue receipt, but surcharge was validly leviable for the assessment year in question.

Ratio Decidendi: In income-tax matters, the operative law is the law in force in the assessment year, and the proceeds from the sale of trees maintained as capital assets are capital receipts rather than revenue receipts.

---