Tenant entitlement under amended tenancy law upheld; appellate court found no error in the High Court's reasoning.

The tenant's entitlement to the benefit of Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as amended by Gujarat Act 36 of 1965, was upheld because the Supreme Court found no error in the High Court's reasoning or conclusion. The Court accepted the High Court's view that the respondent-tenant fell within the amended provision and declined to interfere, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the respondent-tenant was entitled to the benefit of Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 as amended by Gujarat Act 36 of 1965.

Analysis: The order records that no error was found in the reasoning or conclusion of the High Court. The High Court had held that the respondent-tenant was entitled to the benefit of the said provision as amended, and that view was not interfered with.

Conclusion: The entitlement of the respondent-tenant to the benefit of Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was upheld, and the appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the High Court's conclusion that a tenant is entitled to the benefit of an amended tenancy provision is found correct, the appellate court will not interfere and the appeal will be dismissed.

---