<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 485 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169499</link>
    <description>The tenant&#039;s entitlement to the benefit of Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as amended by Gujarat Act 36 of 1965, was upheld because the Supreme Court found no error in the High Court&#039;s reasoning or conclusion. The Court accepted the High Court&#039;s view that the respondent-tenant fell within the amended provision and declined to interfere, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 16:44:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 485 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169499</link>
      <description>The tenant&#039;s entitlement to the benefit of Section 32-M of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, as amended by Gujarat Act 36 of 1965, was upheld because the Supreme Court found no error in the High Court&#039;s reasoning or conclusion. The Court accepted the High Court&#039;s view that the respondent-tenant fell within the amended provision and declined to interfere, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>