Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the claim of return of goods sold could be allowed only in the quarter in which the goods were returned under Rule 22(4) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Rules, 2003, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: Rule 22(4) provides that no claim of return of goods sold to any person is admissible unless made in the return for the quarter in which the goods have been returned. The provision was read as restricting the claim to that very quarter and not permitting it in any other period. As the authorities had not examined the issue in the light of this rule, further consideration by the assessing authority was warranted.
Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in accordance with law, and the other question was treated as academic.