Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the absence of a formally constituted provident fund committee and the absence of framed rules under the education statute negatived entrustment and made the charge under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code unsustainable.
Analysis: The governing principle is that criminal breach of trust does not require a technical trust in the strict law-of-trust sense. For Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code, entrustment is satisfied where property is made over to another to be retained or dealt with for a specified purpose, while the original owner retains title and the other person has custody or dominion over the property. On the facts, the provident fund contributions were alleged to have been received and handled for the benefit of the teachers, and the absence of statutory rules or a committee did not eliminate the factual basis of entrustment or the possibility of misappropriation.
Conclusion: The quashing of the charge was and the prosecution could proceed; the issue is decided in favour of the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The order quashing the criminal proceedings was set aside and the matter was permitted to go to trial.
Ratio Decidendi: Entrustment for criminal breach of trust may arise from the factual handing over of property for a defined purpose, and the offence under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code is not dependent on the existence of formal statutory rules or a technical trust.