Concurrent factual findings on turnover suppression and compounding requirements were upheld; revisional interference was refused absent perversity.

Concurrent findings of turnover suppression and tax evasion based on recovered records and corroborating tax materials were upheld, because revisional interference is not justified on disputed facts unless perversity is shown. The assessee's plea for compounding also failed, as it was inconsistent with the absence of registration and with no proof of valid compounding payment for the relevant years. The revisional challenge to the penalty under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act therefore did not succeed, and the penalty as reduced by the revisional authority remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's finding of turnover suppression and tax evasion, and the consequential penalty under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, warranted interference in revision on the ground that the accounts were not verified and that the assessee was entitled to compounding.

Analysis: The revisions turned entirely on disputed facts. The alleged books of account were found not to be available as claimed, and the departmental adoption of turnover was supported by recovered records, income-tax returns, profit and loss statements, and other materials. The plea for compounding was inconsistent with the absence of registration and with the lack of proof of any valid compounding payment for the relevant years. In revisional jurisdiction, interference with concurrent factual findings is not warranted unless perversity is shown, and no such perversity was established.

Conclusion: The challenge to the findings on suppression, tax evasion, and penalty failed, and the revisions were rejected in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The decision affirms the concurrent factual findings of the authorities below and leaves undisturbed the penalty as reduced by the revisional authority.

Ratio Decidendi: In revisional proceedings, concurrent findings of fact based on documentary material will not be interfered with absent perversity, and a plea for compounding cannot succeed without registration and proof of valid compliance.

---