https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167747 Concurrent findings of turnover suppression and tax evasion based on recovered records and corroborating tax materials were upheld, because revisional interference is not justified on disputed facts unless perversity is shown. The assessee's plea for compounding also failed, as it was inconsistent with the absence of registration and with no proof of valid compounding payment for the relevant years. The revisional challenge to the penalty under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act therefore did not succeed, and the penalty as reduced by the revisional authority remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167747 Concurrent findings of turnover suppression and tax evasion based on recovered records and corroborating tax materials were upheld, because revisional interference is not justified on disputed facts unless perversity is shown. The assessee's plea for compounding also failed, as it was inconsistent with the absence of registration and with no proof of valid compounding payment for the relevant years. The revisional challenge to the penalty under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act therefore did not succeed, and the penalty as reduced by the revisional authority remained undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167747