Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 could be sustained for stock transfer of goods in 1996 where the declaration form ST-18A was blank and the transaction preceded the notification dated 20.03.2000.
Analysis: The goods were intercepted on 15.10.1996 and the material on record showed that the movement was by way of stock transfer. The Court noted that the relevant incident occurred prior to the Government notification dated 20.03.2000 and that, on the admitted facts, the case was covered by earlier decisions holding that penalty could not be imposed in such pre-notification stock transfer situations merely because the declaration form was blank or not carried.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 78(5) was not liable to be sustained, and the Tax Board's order deleting the penalty was upheld.