Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal filed beyond the maximum period of limitation prescribed under section 22(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, and whether the delay could be condoned by invoking section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: Section 22(2) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 fixes a limitation period of sixty days for filing the appeal and permits condonation only within a further period of one hundred and eighty days on sufficient cause being shown. The provision is a self-contained special limitation scheme governing appeals before the Tribunal. Once the outer limit expires, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to treat the appeal as within time. In such a special statutory framework, the general provision under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 stands excluded. The conclusion is supported by the principle that where the legislature has expressly prescribed a maximum condonable period, the court cannot enlarge it by implication.
Conclusion: The Tribunal correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay beyond the statutory outer limit and rightly dismissed the appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special tax statute prescribes a fixed limitation period with a limited power of condonation up to a stated maximum, the general power of condonation under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is impliedly excluded and the appellate authority cannot entertain an appeal filed beyond the outer limit.