Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in upholding the cancellation of the Assessing Officer's rectification order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the reference disclosed any question of law.
Analysis: The assessment had been made with reference to section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Assessing Officer later invoked section 154 to rectify what was treated as a mistake. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that there was no error apparent from the record warranting rectification, and the Tribunal affirmed that view. On these findings, the controversy turned on appreciation of facts rather than on any debatable legal issue.
Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal's view was upheld and it was held that no question of law arose.