<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 61 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16762</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 154 was found unwarranted because no error apparent from the record was shown in the assessment made with reference to section 115J. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal treated the matter as one of factual appreciation rather than a debatable legal issue, and upheld cancellation of the rectification order. On that basis, the reference was answered for the assessee and no question of law was held to arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 61 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16762</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 154 was found unwarranted because no error apparent from the record was shown in the assessment made with reference to section 115J. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal treated the matter as one of factual appreciation rather than a debatable legal issue, and upheld cancellation of the rectification order. On that basis, the reference was answered for the assessee and no question of law was held to arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>