Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1984 (5) TMI 257 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Imported computer peripherals qualify for duty concessions as Tribunal equates 'Computer sub-system' with 'Computer peripheral units.' The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that the imported goods, including Floppy Disk Drives and Digital Tape Transport, qualified for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Imported computer peripherals qualify for duty concessions as Tribunal equates "Computer sub-system" with "Computer peripheral units."

                            The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that the imported goods, including Floppy Disk Drives and Digital Tape Transport, qualified for duty concessions under Notification Nos. 272-Cus., 47-Cus., and 115-Cus. The Tribunal accepted that "Computer sub-system" and "Computer peripheral units" were synonymous based on previous clarifications and granted the appellants the benefit of the duty concessions. As a result, the appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the terms "Computer sub-system" and "Computer peripheral units" are synonymous.
                            2. Whether the imported goods (Floppy Disk Drive, Line Printers, Magnetic Tape Drive, Dot Matrix Printers, Digital Tape Transport) qualify for duty concession under Notification Nos. 272-Cus., dated 2-8-1976, 47-Cus., dated 1-3-1979, and 115-Cus., dated 19-6-1980.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Synonymity of "Computer sub-system" and "Computer peripheral units":
                            The primary issue in these appeals is whether the terms "Computer sub-system" and "Computer peripheral units" used in different notifications are synonymous. The appellants argued that these terms are interchangeable and that the goods they imported fall within the scope of these terms. They relied on clarifications from the Department of Electronics and various authoritative sources, including the Ministry of Finance, which stated that "Computer sub-system" means "Computer peripheral units." The Tribunal accepted this interpretation, noting that the respondent did not dispute this claim and had, in fact, issued orders in other cases affirming this interpretation.

                            2. Eligibility for Duty Concession:
                            The appeals concern the eligibility of various imported items for duty concession under three specific notifications. The appellants had claimed duty concessions for Floppy Disk Drives, Line Printers, Magnetic Tape Drives, Dot Matrix Printers, and Digital Tape Transport under Notification Nos. 272-Cus., 47-Cus., and 115-Cus. The Appellate Collector of Customs had previously rejected these claims, stating that the items did not qualify as "Computer sub-systems" or "Computer peripheral units."

                            Detailed Analysis for Each Notification:

                            Notification No. 272-Cus., dated 2-8-1976:
                            This notification exempted Computers and Computer Systems from a portion of the customs duty. The appellants argued that their imported goods fell under this notification. However, the Appellate Collector initially held that the goods could not be considered as sub-systems or peripherals of computers, thus denying the concession.

                            Notification No. 47-Cus., dated 1-3-1979:
                            This notification, which superseded the previous one, also provided exemptions for Computer and Computer Sub-systems. The appellants claimed benefits under this notification as well. The Appellate Collector again rejected their claims, stating that the items were ancillary equipment and not part of the central processor unit.

                            Notification No. 115-Cus., dated 19-6-1980:
                            This notification used the term "Computer peripheral units" instead of "Computer sub-systems." The appellants argued that this change in terminology did not alter the scope of the items covered. The Tribunal accepted this argument, noting that the Department of Electronics had clarified that the terms were synonymous.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal found that the items in question (Floppy Disk Drives and Digital Tape Transport) had already been deemed Computer sub-systems and peripherals in previous decisions. For the remaining items, the Tribunal accepted the respondent's concession that the terms "sub-system" and "peripheral" were intended to convey the same meaning. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders under appeal and granted the appellants the benefit of the duty concessions under the relevant notifications.

                            Result:
                            The appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants, granting them the duty concessions under Notification Nos. 272-Cus., 47-Cus., and 115-Cus.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found