Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether light diesel oil and furnace oil cleared from bonded stocks as ship's stores for foreign-going vessels were liable to duty during the period 16-12-1977 to 22-8-1978, and whether the rebate limitation under Rule 12 governed such clearances.
Analysis: During the material period, additional excise duty on the goods stood exempted, but Notification No. 349/77 reduced the rebate otherwise available under Rule 12 for duty-paid clearances. The supplies in question were from bonded stocks, not duty-paid stocks, and Rule 12 notifications were therefore not directly applicable on their terms. Rule 13 permitted export without payment of duty from a warehouse or licensed factory, but the phraseology and the scheme of the rules showed that ship's stores could be exported under that rule only in the manner contemplated by the export rebate provisions. The Tribunal followed the Delhi High Court view that even exports under Rule 13 from bond were subject to the duty incidence required under the Rule 12 framework, and no contrary binding decision was shown.
Conclusion: The clearance of the goods from bonded stocks as ship's stores was rightly subjected to duty, and the appeals fail.