<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 259 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167280</link>
    <description>Clearance of light diesel oil and furnace oil from bonded stocks as ship&#039;s stores for foreign-going vessels was held dutiable for the relevant period because the goods were not cleared from duty-paid stocks and Rule 12 rebate notifications did not apply on their terms. Although additional excise duty stood exempted during the period, Notification No. 349/77 reduced the rebate otherwise available under Rule 12 only for duty-paid clearances, while Rule 13 permitted export without payment of duty from bond or a licensed factory only in the manner contemplated by the export rebate framework. The Tribunal followed the Delhi High Court view that ship&#039;s stores exported from bond remained subject to the duty incidence required under that framework, and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 259 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167280</link>
      <description>Clearance of light diesel oil and furnace oil from bonded stocks as ship&#039;s stores for foreign-going vessels was held dutiable for the relevant period because the goods were not cleared from duty-paid stocks and Rule 12 rebate notifications did not apply on their terms. Although additional excise duty stood exempted during the period, Notification No. 349/77 reduced the rebate otherwise available under Rule 12 only for duty-paid clearances, while Rule 13 permitted export without payment of duty from bond or a licensed factory only in the manner contemplated by the export rebate framework. The Tribunal followed the Delhi High Court view that ship&#039;s stores exported from bond remained subject to the duty incidence required under that framework, and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>