Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether seized goods in transit were liable to continued detention and, if release was warranted, what security could be demanded for their release, including the security pertaining to entry tax.
Analysis: The goods were accompanied by transport documents showing movement from Haryana to Uttarakhand through Uttar Pradesh. The absence of a downloaded transit declaration form by itself was not treated as conclusive of sale within the State. The statutory scheme was treated as creating only a rebuttable presumption, and the presence of other relevant documents was held sufficient to justify release of the goods on security. Relying on the earlier view that transit documentation must be assessed with the surrounding papers, the Court held that the tax authorities could secure the revenue by taking security equivalent to the tax leviable on the goods, while the balance could be protected by security other than cash or bank guarantee. For entry tax, the demanded security was found excessive and was scaled down.
Conclusion: The seizure was not sustained in the form insisted upon by the authorities, and the goods were directed to be released on furnishing security equivalent to the tax leviable on the goods and security other than cash or bank guarantee for the remaining amount. The entry tax security was reduced to 20 per cent, with liberty to furnish a bank guarantee if other security was not available.