Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation and, if so, whether the revisional proceedings founded on that assessment could survive.
Analysis: The statutory scheme required the assessment to be completed within three years from the last date prescribed for furnishing the return. On the admitted dates, the assessment could have been framed only up to 30 April 2005, but it was in fact made on 9 April 2007. The order was therefore beyond the prescribed period and could not be sustained. Once the assessment itself was void and without jurisdiction, the later revisional action based on that assessment was also unsustainable.
Conclusion: The assessment was time-barred and invalid, and the revisional order founded on it was also liable to be set aside; the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose for interference, and the State's revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment made beyond the statutory limitation period is void and without jurisdiction, and revisional proceedings resting on such an assessment cannot be sustained.