Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be levied on turnover estimated by the assessing authority by way of equal addition, or whether it was confined to the actual suppressed turnover alone.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the Explanation to section 12(3)(b), which excludes from penalty turnover representing estimated additions and confines penalty to actual suppression. It sustained the tax addition made on estimation, but for penalty purposes held that only the turnover actually found suppressed could be taken into account. The High Court found no reason to interfere with that approach.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 12(3)(b) was held to be leviable only on the actual suppressed turnover and not on the estimated turnover added by the assessing authority.