Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount credited to a gratuity reserve account for possible future retrenchment compensation under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was an ascertained liability deductible in computing business profits under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The liability under section 25F arises only when retrenchment actually takes place and is therefore dependent on a future contingency. A mere provision made in anticipation of a possible retrenchment is not a liability in praesenti, even under the mercantile system of accounting. The amount was not paid out, not credited to the employees, not placed in trust, and remained under the assessee's control as a reserve. The provision was also not shown to be a fair or scientific estimate of the present value of any future obligation, and a reserve for a contingent liability does not amount to expenditure actually incurred.
Conclusion: The amount was not an ascertained liability or deductible expenditure, and the deduction was rightly disallowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A reserve created for a contingent future liability, which is neither accrued nor actually expended and remains under the assessee's dominion, is not deductible in computing taxable business profits.