Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sums set apart for anticipated holiday wages under section 79 of the Factories Act, 1948, and for anticipated retrenchment compensation under section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, were allowable deductions under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Deduction under section 10(2)(xv) is confined to expenditure actually incurred or to a liability that has already accrued; a mere provision for a future contingency is not expenditure. Holiday wages under section 79 depend on workers actually taking leave, being discharged, or quitting after refusal of leave, and the employer cannot know in advance whether, when, or to what extent such liability will arise. The obligation therefore remains contingent until the relevant events occur. Retrenchment compensation under section 25F similarly depends on the employer's decision to retrench and on the fulfilment of statutory conditions precedent; there is no present obligation to pay compensation to any identified employee in the accounting year. The liability is thus contingent and not an accrued liability.
Conclusion: The claimed deductions were not allowable, and the answer to the reference was in the affirmative against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A deduction under section 10(2)(xv) is not permissible for amounts reserved against contingent future liabilities; only expenditure or liabilities that have actually accrued can be deducted, even under the mercantile system.