Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal against an order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise and Customs under the Gold Control Act, 1968 lay to the Appellate Tribunal or to the Collector (Appeals).
Analysis: Section 80 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 provided an appeal to the Collector (Appeals) against a decision or order passed by a Gold Control Officer lower in rank than a Collector of Central Excise or of Customs. Section 81(1) of the Gold Control Act, 1968 conferred appellate jurisdiction on the Appellate Tribunal only in respect of an order passed by the Collector of Central Excise or of Customs as an adjudicating authority, or in the other situations specified therein. Section 78 of the Gold Control Act, 1968 showed that the Collector of Central Excise or of Customs could adjudge confiscation or impose penalty without limit, while other Gold Control Officers could exercise only limited powers authorised by notification. The notification empowering Additional Collectors to adjudicate in specified matters did not alter their position as officers below the rank of Collector of Central Excise for the purpose of Section 80.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable before the Appellate Tribunal and lay before the Collector (Appeals).