Excise valuation under factory-gate price rule: separate post-clearance stabilizer value excluded, while service charges were included.

For excise valuation under section 4(a), where independent wholesale sales at the factory gate establish an ascertainable wholesale cash price, that price governs valuation, subject to permissible trade discount. The value of a voltage stabilizer fitted by wholesale dealers after clearance was excluded because it had a separate identity, was not manufactured by the assessee, and was not an inseparable part of the refrigerator. Service charges were included in the assessable value because the advertising and warranty materials did not show them to be a distinct post-clearance levy, and they were treated as part of the normal price structure.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the wholesale cash price of the refrigerators was ascertainable at the factory gate for valuation under section 4(a); (ii) whether the value of the voltage stabilizer fitted by the wholesale dealers was includible in the assessable value; (iii) whether service charges were includible in the assessable value.

Issue (i): whether the wholesale cash price of the refrigerators was ascertainable at the factory gate for valuation under section 4(a).

Analysis: The sales to the independent wholesale dealers and to the related sales corporation were all at the same price, and the independent character of the sales to the wholesale dealers was not disputed. On that basis, a wholesale cash price at the factory gate was available, and the existence of sales through one channel did not destroy the availability of the wholesale price for valuation.

Conclusion: The wholesale cash price of Rs. 2,000 was the proper basis for valuation under section 4(a), subject to permissible trade discount.

Issue (ii): whether the value of the voltage stabilizer was includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The stabilizer was fitted by the wholesale dealers after clearance, had a separate identity, was not manufactured by the appellants, and was not an inseparable part of the refrigerator, since the refrigerator could operate without it in suitable conditions.

Conclusion: The value of the voltage stabilizer was not includible in the assessable value.

Issue (iii): whether service charges were includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The advertising material did not support the plea that service charges were a separate post-clearance levy. The warranty and after-sales arrangement did not establish that the charges were distinct from the normal price structure, and such charges were treated as built into the price of the refrigerator.

Conclusion: The service charges were includible in the assessable value.

Final Conclusion: The valuation was revised by accepting the factory-gate wholesale cash price and excluding the stabilizer value, while sustaining inclusion of service charges in the assessable value.

Ratio Decidendi: For excise valuation, the ascertainable wholesale cash price at the factory gate governs section 4(a), but only the value of items forming part of the assessable goods is includible, not the value of separately fitted accessories supplied post-clearance.

---