<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 150 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165618</link>
    <description>For excise valuation under section 4(a), where independent wholesale sales at the factory gate establish an ascertainable wholesale cash price, that price governs valuation, subject to permissible trade discount. The value of a voltage stabilizer fitted by wholesale dealers after clearance was excluded because it had a separate identity, was not manufactured by the assessee, and was not an inseparable part of the refrigerator. Service charges were included in the assessable value because the advertising and warranty materials did not show them to be a distinct post-clearance levy, and they were treated as part of the normal price structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 150 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165618</link>
      <description>For excise valuation under section 4(a), where independent wholesale sales at the factory gate establish an ascertainable wholesale cash price, that price governs valuation, subject to permissible trade discount. The value of a voltage stabilizer fitted by wholesale dealers after clearance was excluded because it had a separate identity, was not manufactured by the assessee, and was not an inseparable part of the refrigerator. Service charges were included in the assessable value because the advertising and warranty materials did not show them to be a distinct post-clearance levy, and they were treated as part of the normal price structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>