Popular commercial meaning governs handicraft classification, and handmade agarbathis retain exemption despite limited chemical processing.

Handmade agarbathis were held to be handicrafts for excise classification because the term was undefined and had to be understood in its popular and commercial sense; treatment by handicrafts organisations supported that character, and the use of some chemical process did not change their essential handmade nature. The writ petition was also held maintainable despite alternative appeal and revision remedies, because the departmental view was already settled and further statutory recourse would have served no useful purpose. The petitioner was therefore entitled to exemption from excise duty on handmade agarbathis.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether handmade agarbathis are handicrafts and therefore exempt from excise duty under the relevant exemption notification; (ii) whether the writ petition was barred by the existence of an alternative statutory remedy.

Issue (i): Whether handmade agarbathis are handicrafts and therefore exempt from excise duty under the relevant exemption notification.

Analysis: The word "handicraft" was not defined in the statute or the rules, so it had to be understood in its popular and commercial sense. The accepted test in taxing statutes is the meaning attributed to the goods in trade and commerce, not a scientific or technical description. On the materials placed before the Court, handmade agarbathis were treated as handicrafts by the Handicrafts Board and connected development organisations, and the fact that some chemical process was involved did not alter their essential character as hand-made articles.

Conclusion: Handmade agarbathis are handicrafts and are exempt from excise duty.

Issue (ii): Whether the writ petition was barred by the existence of an alternative statutory remedy.

Analysis: The existence of appeal and revision remedies did not preclude writ relief in the circumstances, because the departmental authorities had already taken a settled adverse view and insisting on further statutory remedies would have served no useful purpose.

Conclusion: The writ petition was maintainable notwithstanding the alternative remedy.

Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded and the petitioner was held entitled to exemption on the ground that handmade agarbathis fall within the category of handicrafts.

Ratio Decidendi: In fiscal classification, an undefined product must be construed according to its popular and commercial understanding, and a good does not cease to be a handicraft merely because some chemical process is used in its manufacture.

---