Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gold coins and medallions sold by the assessee during the relevant years were classifiable as bullion under item 1 of the Second Schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, or as semi-finished gold articles under entry 4(4) of the Third Schedule, and the consequent rate of tax applicable.
Analysis: The items were minted gold pieces, some embossed with religious images and some bearing company logos, and were not shown to be raw material for ornaments. They were treated as articles intended to be worn or otherwise used as finished products, and the Court followed its earlier view that such goods fall within entry 4(4) of the Third Schedule rather than the bullion entry claimed by the assessee. The assessment at 12.5 per cent under the residuary entry was therefore held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The goods were not accepted as bullion under the Second Schedule; they were held to fall under entry 4(4) of the Third Schedule, attracting tax at 4 per cent, in favour of the assessee to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The assessment was reduced by applying the specific schedule entry instead of the residuary rate, but the assessee did not succeed in bringing the goods within the bullion category.
Ratio Decidendi: Minted gold coins and medallions that are finished products and not raw material for ornaments are to be classified under the specific entry for semi-finished gold articles, not under the bullion entry or the residuary entry.