1998 (1) TMI 39 - HC - Income Tax

Deed of 1953 Gifted Property, Tax Ruling Upheld

SC. Mohammed Versus Commissioner Of Income-Tax

The court affirmed the Tribunal's findings that the deed of 1953 gifted the corpus of the properties to the assessee, the donor did not intend to give ... Muslim Law Issues Involved:1. Interpretation of the deed dated 5th August 1953 regarding the nature of the gift.2. Determination of the donor's intention in the execution of the deed.3. Validity of the sum brought to tax under the Gift Tax Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Interpretation of the deed dated 5th August 1953 regarding the nature of the gift:The Tribunal interpreted the deed dated 5th August 1953 and concluded that 'what was gifted to the applicant was corpus of the properties and not to life interest in the properties.' The assessee argued that under Mohamedan law, a valid gift of life estate could be made with absolute interest in favor of another person. The Tribunal, however, held that the deed operated as an absolute gift in favor of the assessee, and the conditions imposed were void. The court upheld the Tribunal's interpretation, stating that the corpus of the properties was indeed given to the assessee absolutely, and any conditions restraining alienation or vesting properties in favor of the children were invalid.2. Determination of the donor's intention in the execution of the deed:The Tribunal found that 'the intention of the donor (applicant's father) was clearly not to give any property at the time of execution of the deed to the children of the applicant.' The court analyzed the deed and concluded that the donor intended to give the properties to the children of the assessee who would be born in the future, not those existing at the time of the deed's execution. The court referred to principles of Mohamedan law, which do not recognize the splitting of ownership into estates or the creation of life interests. The court cited several precedents, including Nawazish Ali Khan vs. Ali Raza Khan, to support its conclusion that the donor's intention was to provide absolute dominion over the corpus to the assessee.3. Validity of the sum brought to tax under the Gift Tax Act:The Tribunal held that 'the sum of Rs. 1,81,800 was rightly brought to tax under the GT Act.' The court noted that the assessee initially admitted the taxable value of the gift-tax amounting to Rs. 77,788 and later challenged the reassessment. The AAC upheld the jurisdiction of the GTO in reopening the assessment and found that the assessee had only life interest without power of alienation, which did not amount to a gift under Mohamedan law. The Tribunal, however, concluded that the gift made by the assessee in 1969 to his children was liable to be taxed under the Act. The court affirmed this decision, stating that the reassessment and the sum brought to tax were valid and in accordance with the law.Conclusion:The court answered all the questions of law in the affirmative and against the assessee, upholding the Tribunal's findings that the deed of 1953 gifted the corpus of the properties to the assessee, the donor's intention was not to give property to the children at the time of the deed's execution, and the sum of Rs. 1,81,800 was rightly brought to tax under the Gift Tax Act.