Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an immovable property gift is invalid for gift-tax purposes merely because the instrument was not registered under the Registration Act and the Transfer of Property Act.
Analysis: The Gift-tax Act was treated as a self-contained enactment with its own exhaustive definition of "gift". The Court held that the statutory concept of gift under the Gift-tax Act is wider than the concept under the Transfer of Property Act, and that the legislature had not incorporated the registration requirement applicable to gifts of immovable property under section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act. The Court further held that a transaction may still constitute a gift under the Gift-tax Act even if it is imperfect or invalid under the general law governing transfer of property, so long as it falls within the definition enacted in that Act. On the facts, the donee had been put in possession and had exercised rights consistent with ownership.
Conclusion: The absence of a registered deed did not prevent the transaction from amounting to a valid gift under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For gift-tax purposes, the statutory definition of "gift" in the Gift-tax Act is self-contained and is not controlled by the registration requirements of the Transfer of Property Act.