Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of REP licences was taxable as goods and whether penalty under section 12(3)(b) was leviable for non-payment of tax on the turnover.
Analysis: The taxable character of REP licences had already been settled as goods within the meaning of the sales tax enactments. The assessment was made after the law on taxability had been clarified, and the assessee had an opportunity to pay tax before final assessment. The amended penalty provision removed the element of wilful non-disclosure and curtailed the assessing authority's discretion, so that where there was a difference between tax paid and tax assessed, penalty followed under section 12(3)(b). No material was shown to justify non-payment of tax on the turnover before assessment.
Conclusion: The levy of penalty was upheld and the revision was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The assessee failed to establish any legal or factual basis to avoid penalty on the taxable turnover from transfer of REP licences, and the Revenue's position was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where taxable turnover is not paid despite opportunity and the statute mandates penalty on the tax differential without requiring wilful non-disclosure, penalty is leviable.