Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether construction of a boat jetty qualifies as a "building" or otherwise as a civil work for the purpose of payment of tax at the compounded rate under section 7(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: The provision, as it stood at the relevant time, covered specified civil works including buildings, bridges, roads, railway tracks, walls, sea walls, dams and canals, and was later enlarged to include all civil construction works. The work in question involved concrete pillars, a platform and protective stone construction, and functioned as a structure from which passengers boarded and alighted boats. On that basis, the structure was treated as technically falling within the expression "building". The later amendment was also treated as confirming that the legislative intent was not to confine the provision to a narrow category of works.
Conclusion: A boat jetty and its maintenance are eligible for payment of tax at the compounded rate under section 7(7), and the assessee's claim succeeds.
Final Conclusion: The revision filed by the State fails, and the order of the Tribunal granting compounded-rate treatment is sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: The expression used in section 7(7) must receive a broad construction so that a boat jetty, being a concrete structure functioning as a platform for boarding and alighting, can be treated as a building or civil work eligible for compounded-rate taxation.