TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms tax entitlement for boat jetty construction under Kerala Sales Tax Act</h1> <h3>State of Kerala Versus Radhesyam Khandenwall</h3> State of Kerala Versus Radhesyam Khandenwall - [2010] 28 VST 349 (Ker) Issues:1. Entitlement to payment of tax at compounded rate under section 7(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 for the construction of a boat jetty.Analysis:The primary issue in this case revolved around the interpretation of section 7(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, specifically regarding whether the construction of a boat jetty falls within the scope of works eligible for payment of tax at a compounded rate. The Department contended that the construction of a boat jetty did not qualify as the type of civil work covered by the said section, emphasizing that specific items of work were only covered post-amendment. However, the Tribunal, after detailed consideration, concluded that the construction in question met the criteria of building construction, supporting the respondent's claim for the compounded tax rate under section 7(7) of the Act.Furthermore, the Court, concurring with the Tribunal's assessment, highlighted the nature of the construction involved in the boat jetty project, emphasizing the presence of concrete pillars and protective structures akin to building elements. The Court reasoned that a boat jetty, despite not conventionally categorized as a building, could be technically considered as such, aligning with the broader interpretation of the term 'building' under the Act. The subsequent amendment expanding the scope to include all civil construction and maintenance works further supported the conclusion that boat jetty construction qualified for the compounded tax rate under section 7(7).Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision and dismissed the revision filed by the State, affirming the entitlement of the respondent to payment of tax at the compounded rate for the construction of the boat jetty. However, the Court emphasized the assessing officer's responsibility to ensure proper tax collection and prevent the collection of excess tax, underscoring the need for diligent verification and compliance in works contract assessments to maintain tax integrity and fairness.
TaxTMI 