<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 788 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164675</link>
    <description>Section 7(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was construed broadly to include a boat jetty as a civil work eligible for compounded-rate taxation. Because the jetty consisted of concrete pillars, a platform and protective stone construction, and functioned as a boarding and alighting structure, it was treated as technically falling within the expression &quot;building&quot;. The later expansion of the provision to all civil construction works reinforced that legislative intent was not confined to a narrow category. The assessee&#039;s claim succeeded, and the Tribunal&#039;s grant of compounded-rate treatment was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 788 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164675</link>
      <description>Section 7(7) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was construed broadly to include a boat jetty as a civil work eligible for compounded-rate taxation. Because the jetty consisted of concrete pillars, a platform and protective stone construction, and functioned as a boarding and alighting structure, it was treated as technically falling within the expression &quot;building&quot;. The later expansion of the provision to all civil construction works reinforced that legislative intent was not confined to a narrow category. The assessee&#039;s claim succeeded, and the Tribunal&#039;s grant of compounded-rate treatment was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>