Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer who commenced business earlier but applied for registration later could claim correction of the registration certificate so as to obtain retrospective registration from the date of commencement of business, and whether the amended proviso to section 16(2) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act enabled such relief beyond its limited statutory purpose.
Analysis: Under the unamended section 16(2), registration took effect from the date of application. The substituted proviso, effective from 1 April 2009, deems registration to operate from the date of commencement of business only for the limited purposes of payment of tax under section 6(5) and payment under section 8, subject to the conditions stated in the proviso and the further limitation applicable where an offence has already been detected under section 67. The proviso does not confer a general right to seek retrospective registration by correction of the registration certificate. The statutory benefit is available by operation of law for the limited purposes specified, irrespective of whether retrospective registration is formally granted by the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The dealer was not entitled to insist on correction of the registration certificate to obtain retrospective registration from 1 April 2007, but could claim the limited benefit of being treated as registered from that date only for the purposes permitted by the proviso to section 16(2). The appeal was therefore allowed in part.