Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings could be initiated under section 28(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994 before the assessment order had been served on the assessee.
Analysis: Reassessment under section 28 presupposes that an assessment has already been made in the sense of a communicated and operative assessment order. Mere signing of the assessment order by the assessing authority does not complete the assessment for the purpose of reopening, because the assessee must know the basis on which escaped turnover is alleged and must have a fair opportunity to meet the notice. The statutory scheme under section 27, section 28, rule 86, and rule 48 of the Madhya Pradesh Vanijyik Kar Niyam, 1995 indicates that service of the assessment order is essential before reassessment can validly be initiated. The prior authorities relied upon also support the principle that jurisdiction for reassessment does not arise until the assessment order is communicated.
Conclusion: Reassessment notice issued before service of the assessment order was invalid and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The reassessment initiation was quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment jurisdiction can be invoked only after the assessment order has been communicated to the assessee, because a mere unserved or uncommunicated assessment order is not sufficient to trigger reopening proceedings.