Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excess collection of tax by a registered dealer in respect of goods whose price is controlled by law could escape penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: Section 22(2) authorises penalty where any amount is collected by way of tax or purporting to be by way of tax in contravention of section 22(1), whether or not tax is otherwise due in respect of the transaction. The saving argument based on controlled prices did not negate the statutory prohibition against collecting tax unauthorisedly. The legal principle that tax cannot be collected without authority of law also supports the conclusion that such collection amounts to a statutory violation.
Conclusion: The excess collection was a violation of section 22 and penalty under section 22(2) was properly attracted. The finding is against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Any amount collected by way of tax without statutory authority, even if collected on goods subject to controlled pricing, constitutes a contravention attracting penalty under the sales tax law.