TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Taxable Turnover Estimate</h1> <h3>Ratan Hari Rolling Mills Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Trade Tax, UP., Lucknow</h3> Ratan Hari Rolling Mills Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Trade Tax, UP., Lucknow - [2009] 25 VST 299 (All) Issues involved: Assessment of taxable turnover based on rejected books of account, estimation of suppressed turnover, justification of turnover estimate by assessing authority, legality of Tribunal's decision to restore assessing authority's estimate.Assessment of taxable turnover based on rejected books of account:The applicant, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling iron bars, maintained books of account showing gross and net turnover. The assessing authority rejected the books and estimated the taxable turnover. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection but made a different estimate. The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's appeal and restored the assessing authority's order, citing discrepancies found during a road check and subsequent survey at the factory. The Tribunal concluded that the assessing authority's estimate was justified based on the evidence presented.Estimation of suppressed turnover:During a road check, certain goods were found without proper documentation, leading to suspicions of suppressed turnover. The Tribunal observed discrepancies in the books of account, including missing entries and cash discrepancies. The assessing authority estimated a significant suppressed turnover, which the first appellate authority reduced without sufficient basis. The High Court noted that suppression for one day could lead to estimating suppression for the entire year, supporting the assessing authority's estimate.Justification of turnover estimate by assessing authority:The High Court reviewed the Tribunal's decision and found that the assessing authority's estimate of turnover was not arbitrary and had a reasonable basis. The Court emphasized that in best judgment assessments, some guesswork is involved, but as long as the estimate is not arbitrary, it should not be interfered with under section 11 of the Act. The Court concluded that the assessing authority's estimate was justified given the circumstances of the case.Legality of Tribunal's decision to restore assessing authority's estimate:The Tribunal's decision to restore the assessing authority's estimate of turnover was based on the discrepancies found during the road check and survey, indicating possible suppression of turnover. The High Court found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal's decision, as the evidence supported the assessing authority's estimate. The Court dismissed the revision, stating it was devoid of merit based on the facts and circumstances presented.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
