Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether concessional rate of tax under section 4B(1)(a1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was admissible on purchases of rice bran when rice bran was not a declared commodity and the dealer did not hold a recognition certificate.
Analysis: The concession under section 4B(1)(a1) is confined to declared goods liable to tax under section 3D(1) and operates subject to the statutory conditions. The benefit is linked to the scheme of section 4B and the recognition certificate requirement under section 4B(2). Since rice bran is not a declared commodity, the statutory precondition for availing the concessional treatment was not satisfied. The earlier view relied upon by the Tribunal could not govern the matter in light of the later binding interpretation that denied the benefit in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The concessional rate of tax was not admissible to the dealer on purchases of rice bran, and the finding of the Tribunal granting that benefit was incorrect.