Full disclosure in tax returns does not create penalty exposure when only an incorrect legal exemption claim is made.

Full disclosure of turnover and other material facts in a sales tax return does not amount to a false return merely because the dealer advances an unsustainable legal claim for exemption or a lower tax rate. Penalty under section 43(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 applies to concealment of turnover, inaccurate particulars, or a factually false return, not to an incorrect legal plea made on the basis of disclosed facts. The court held that where the dispute concerns only the legal effect of a notification and the facts are correctly stated, penalty is not leviable.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under section 43(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was leviable where the dealer had fully disclosed the turnover and other factual particulars in the return but claimed a lower rate of tax on the basis of a legal plea of exemption.

Analysis: The return disclosed all material facts, including turnover and the basis on which tax was paid at the lower rate. The dispute related to the legal effect of the notification and whether the transformer fell within the category attracting the concessional rate. Section 43(1) applies where there is concealment of turnover, furnishing of inaccurate particulars, or a false return. A return is false only when a statement of fact is falsely made; merely raising an unsustainable legal plea, while fully and correctly disclosing the facts, does not convert the return into a false return.

Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable under section 43(1) because the petitioner had only taken a legal plea for exemption and had not filed a false return.

Ratio Decidendi: Full disclosure of facts in a return, accompanied only by an incorrect legal claim for exemption, does not amount to a false return for the purpose of penalty provisions that require falsity in factual disclosure.

---