Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount already refunded by the assessee to its customer could be forfeited under section 18-AA of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: Section 18-AA is designed to prevent unjust enrichment by a dealer who collects tax in excess of the liability and retains it. The provision must therefore be applied to amounts actually kept by the dealer, and not to amounts that have already been returned to the person from whom they were collected. Once the assessing authority itself noticed that a substantial part of the excess collection had been refunded, there was no basis for forfeiting that returned amount. A hyper-technical construction that would force the customer to make a separate claim against the Department would defeat the object of the provision and lead to unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings.
Conclusion: The forfeiture could not stand in respect of the amount already refunded to the customer, and the assessee succeeded on that issue.
Final Conclusion: The order of forfeiture was interfered with only to the extent of the refunded amount, and the revision was allowed in part with consequential costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Forfeiture under section 18-AA applies only to tax collected and retained by the dealer, not to sums already refunded to the customer from whom they were collected.