Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the option under Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 requires the person to be searched to choose between a Gazetted Officer and a Magistrate, or whether the choice of the nearest available Gazetted Officer or Magistrate rests with the searching officer.
Analysis: Section 50 confers a safeguard on the person to be searched by enabling him to require that the search be conducted in the presence of a senior officer. The language of the provision, especially the use of the word "nearest", indicates that the relevant choice is only whether the search should occur before such a senior officer. Once that request is made, the officer conducting the search must take the person before whichever of the two, namely a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, is nearest and conveniently available. The statute does not create a further right in the accused to insist on one of those two alternatives.
Conclusion: The option under Section 50 is limited to a search before the nearest available Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and the choice between them lies with the searching officer. The contention that the accused must be given the choice between a Gazetted Officer and a Magistrate was rejected.