Supreme Court alters orders, denies reinstatement, grants back wages. Workman offered Rs 20,000 settlement. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, altering the orders of the High Court and labor court. The respondent workman's misconduct was proven, leading to a ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, altering the orders of the High Court and labor court. The respondent workman's misconduct was proven, leading to a decision to deny reinstatement but grant back wages. The respondent was offered an additional sum of Rs 20,000 to settle the issue. The respondent must choose between reinstatement without back wages or just back wages. The decision was made with no costs involved.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, altering the orders of the High Court and labor court. The respondent workman's misconduct was proven, leading to a decision to deny reinstatement but grant back wages. The respondent was offered an additional sum of Rs 20,000 to settle the issue. The respondent must choose between reinstatement without back wages or just back wages. The decision was made with no costs involved.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
