https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161991 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, altering the orders of the High Court and labor court. The respondent workman's misconduct was proven, leading to a decision to deny reinstatement but grant back wages. The respondent was offered an additional sum of Rs 20,000 to settle the issue. The respondent must choose between reinstatement without back wages or just back wages. The decision was made with no costs involved. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:13:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161991 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, altering the orders of the High Court and labor court. The respondent workman's misconduct was proven, leading to a decision to deny reinstatement but grant back wages. The respondent was offered an additional sum of Rs 20,000 to settle the issue. The respondent must choose between reinstatement without back wages or just back wages. The decision was made with no costs involved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161991