Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of the assessed sales tax from a sick industrial company could proceed during pendency of the reference and inquiry before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction without prior permission of the Board.
Analysis: The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and had been declared a sick industrial company with a reference registered before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. The Court noted that an inquiry was pending under section 16 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and that the statutory bar under section 22 operated against recovery proceedings. The protection was treated as continuing during pendency of the inquiry and, where applicable, during the stages connected with framing, preparation, sanction, implementation of a scheme, and appeal before the competent authority.
Conclusion: Recovery of the assessed amount could not be made without prior permission of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction. The direction was issued in favour of the petitioner-company and the impugned order was modified accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: When a reference of a sick industrial company is registered and an inquiry is pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars coercive recovery of dues without the Board's prior permission.